It is difficult to imagine a time when the motto “Eight hours for work, eight hours for rest and eight hours for what you will” was not the rule of thumb for workers. While Phillip II of Spain issued an ordinance as far back as 1594 that established the eight-hour workday, in other countries this simple motto would only take hold after labour strikes which often turned deadly.
Our history is filled with violent strikes across all races from 1910 and onwards, but with the advent of democracy in 1994, it became a constitutional right to strike in accordance with section 23 of the Constitution.
The Labour Relations Act was promulgated in 1995 and in section 1 describes the primary objectives of the Act as being, among others:
- to give effect to and regulate the fundamental rights conferred by the Constitution;
- to provide a framework within which employees and their trade unions, employers and employers’ organisations can collectively bargain wages, terms of employment and formulate industrial policy; and
- to promote orderly collective bargaining, participation in decision-making in the workplace by employees and the effective resolution of labour disputes.
While the Constitution and LRA both protect the right to strike as a means of collective bargaining, a group of employees who plan on striking should however remember that there are certain procedural requirements in section 64 of the LRA that must be met for a strike to be deemed a protected strike. Firstly, the employees and employers must engage in conciliation and if unsuccessful, obtain a certificate that confirming that, alternatively that the matter has been referred to the CCMA but that it has remained unresolved for a period of 30 days. Secondly, the employees are required to furnish the employer with 48 hours’ notice of the intended strike.
If the employees fail to comply with these two requirements, the strike may be deemed to be unprotected, and the employee may be dismissed for their participation, subject to substantive fairness of the dismissal.
March 17, 2025
Tyes of Property – Auction
A property auction is where immovable (or movable) property is placed up for a public sale which is…
0 Comments5 Minutes
February 23, 2025
The “Without Prejudice” rule and it’s Common Misconception
The words “without prejudice” is some of the most misunderstood and misused words in the legal…
0 Comments4 Minutes
February 23, 2025
Understanding the Legal Implications of Failure To Diagnose
In healthcare, a prompt and accurate diagnosis is not just a clinical expectation, but also a legal…
0 Comments6 Minutes
February 13, 2025
The Closure of ArcelorMittal South Africa’s Newcastle Operations: Legal, Economic, and Social Implications
Introduction ArcelorMittal South Africa (AMSA) announced on 16 January 2025 that it had closed its…
0 Comments7 Minutes
November 19, 2024
Informed Consent: understanding your rights before Treatment and Surgery
One of the most critical aspects of receiving healthcare is informed consent, which is one of the…
0 Comments5 Minutes
November 11, 2024
Remote Commissioning of Affidavits
In a number of recent cases there has been a question whether the commissioning of affidavits can…
0 Comments4 Minutes
November 5, 2024
Civil damages claim parallel to criminal charges – A simple guide
When an individual suffers harm due to someone else’s unlawful conduct, they may consider either…
0 Comments5 Minutes
October 28, 2024
Legal Consequences of Cohabitation in South Africa
Cohabitation, the act of living together without being legally married is becoming increasingly…
0 Comments3 Minutes
October 18, 2024
The South African “Fifth Amendment” The Right not to be Compelled to give self-incriminating Evidence
Most of us have heard the American expression of “Pleading the Fifth”. This comes about in most…
0 Comments5 Minutes
October 10, 2024
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) can best be defined as a manner for the resolution of a…
0 Comments5 Minutes